New Bill Could Bump Up Incentives for Suburbs to Take City Kids

Whether 9-year-old Nejaughn Ware Jr. ever gets to enroll in a suburban school or continues to attend Hartford's public schools could depend on more than just the annual school choice lottery.

The fourth-grader's future also could hinge on a bill pending before the state legislature.

Lawmakers appear poised to substantially bolster financial incentives to expand the state's Open Choice program, a longstanding school desegregation program that allows children from Hartford to enroll in nearby suburban schools.

Nejaughn Ware Jr., a 4th-grader at Hartford’s Wish School, has applied for a suburban school in the state’s Open Choice program

Until now, many suburban schools, citing a lack of space or money, have accepted only a trickle of students from Hartford, leaving thousands of others, such as Nejaughn, on waiting lists.

"For three years, he's been put on a list," said Jacqueline Gamble-Ware, Nejaughn's mother, who also is hoping to land a spot in a suburban kindergarten class for her 5-year-old daughter, Jahara.

Nejaughn and Jahara are black. Moving some of Hartford's largely minority student population to integrated or mostly white suburban schools is part of the state's strategy to comply with a 1996 state Supreme Court order in the Sheff vs. O'Neill desegregation case. But enrollment in the suburban choice program has remained largely stagnant while the state has put most of its emphasis on building racially integrated magnet schools with popular specialty themes such as science, performing arts and international studies.

Now, however, in light of the state's deep fiscal crisis and the high cost of building and operating magnet schools, many educators and politicians believe the suburban choice program is a far less expensive alternative.

The choice program was known as Project Concern when it began 45 years ago with 266 Hartford children bused to schools in Farmington,, Manchester, Simsbury, South Windsor and West Hartford. The program reached about 1,200 students in the 1970s but fell on hard times and nearly closed.

Today, enrollment is about 1,300 students in 28 districts in the Greater Hartford region, but growth has been slow even though a state study two years ago said suburbs have the capacity to enroll nearly three times that number.

About 28 percent of Hartford's minority schoolchildren now attend integrated magnet schools, charter schools, regional technical and agricultural high schools or suburban schools. However, under terms of a court-approved agreement with the Sheff plaintiffs, the state must increase that number to 41 percent by the 2012-2013 school year or meet at least 80 percent of the demand for seats.

"Open Choice is one of the most efficient policy tools the state has to achieve the goals of Sheff vs. O'Neill," said state Rep. Andrew Fleischmann, D-West Hartford, co-chairman of the legislature's Education Committee. "It's far more costly to put [children] into magnet schools."

Since 2007, the state has offered $2,500 per pupil to encourage suburban districts to accept urban children under the choice program, but a proposal pending in the General Assembly would raise the stipend to $3,000 in districts where urban transfer students make up less than 2 percent of enrollment, $4,000 in districts exceeding 2 percent and $6,000 for those above 3 percent.

"I am extremely optimistic about [the bill] passing," said Fleischmann.

That would be welcome news to school districts that have supported the program and probably would encourage others to bolster their participation, particularly as public school enrollments in many districts have begun a gradual decline.

"I really think this is the most powerful incentive we could move forward right now," said Becky Tyrrell, school board chairwoman in Plainville, where 47 Open Choice transfers account for just under 2 percent of the district's enrollment.

"We had planned on increasing our [Open Choice] enrollment pretty considerably this year. If this [legislation] goes into effect, we're certainly going to try to hit the 3 percent figure."

Martha Stone, a lawyer for the plaintiffs in the Sheff case, said Open Choice "is a cost-effective means of meeting the Sheff goals, but suburban districts are not coming forward in the absence of any incentives...There hasn't been strong enough leadership from the state and from local boards of education to make it happen."

READ MORE