The Local Politics of Closing Nuclear Power Plants
New York and New Jersey both have aging plants

While nuclear power has enjoyed a resurgence of bipartisan support in Washington — like in this 2009 op-ed from Sens. John Kerry (D-MA) and Lindsay Graham (R-SC) — the local politics around nuclear energy have remained charged. In both New Jersey and New York, leaders have been looking for exit plans for their decades-old nuclear plants.
New Jersey's Oyster Creek Plant
After a long and political fight in New Jersey, the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission granted a 20-year operating license for Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in April 2009. Just as then-Governor Jon Corzine was leaving office later that year, he signed off on a plan to require the installation of cooling towers at the plant, a demand of environmentalists worried about the plant’s impact on surrounding waterways. As he prepared to take office, Chris Christie accused Corzine of “last-minute politics” by waiting until just before leaving office.
The state’s position changed when Christie took office. The Christie administration brokered a deal with Excelon Corp, who runs the plant. No expensive cooling towers would be required, but the plant would close ten years into its 20-year license, no later than December 19, 2019.
At the time, Christie touted the agreement as a conservation victory for nearby Barnegut Bay.
"Barnegat Bay is one of my top environmental priorities. After years of inaction and the Bay's declining ecological health, we finally have a comprehensive plan that will prevent further degradation of the Bay and begin the restoration of this incredible New Jersey resource,” Christie said in a press release.




Comments
Post new comment